Report: Incidence of pressure ulcers increased 80% between 1993 and 2006 among hospital patients
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, December 10, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
New information from the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) shows that the incidence of pressure ulcers among hospital patients increased steadily between 1993 and 2006. Published iIn its report Hospitalizations Related to Pressure Ulcers among Adults 18 Years and Older, 2006, The the AHRQ analyzed more than 503,000 patients whose hospitalizations were pressure ulcer-related. Findings included
- An increase in pressure ulcers being the primary diagnosis (45,500 in 2006, up from 35,800 in 1993)
- An increase in pressure ulcers being the secondary diagnosis, which means patients were admitted for another reason, but developed pressure ulcers before or after admission (457,800 in 2006, up from 245,600 in 1993)
- A death rate of 1 in 25 when pressure ulcers were primary diagnosis, and a higher death rate of 1 in 8 when pressure ulcers were the secondary diagnosis
- A greater cost and number of days spent in the hospital for those patients with pressure ulcers
To read the report, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Comments
0 comments on “Report: Incidence of pressure ulcers increased 80% between 1993 and 2006 among hospital patients ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Searched
