Institute of Medicine suggests more non-working time for medical residents
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, December 3, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has asked U.S. hospitals to look at their resident programs and ensure they are keeping patients—and residents—safe. In the recently-published report Resident Duty Hours: Enhancing Sleep, Supervision, and Safety, The IOM says that while the 80-hours a week that graduate students are allowed to work is appropriate, residents should not work a 30-hour shift without rest because doing so can lead to serious lapses in patient safety and medical errors. If a resident works more than 16 hours, he or she should be allowed a five-hour uninterrupted sleep period.
Some of the other recommendations the IOM made include ensuring that residents have enough time in between shifts that they can get an adequate amount of sleep, as well as making sure they have full days off in their schedules. Additionally, "medical moonlighting," which the IOM has defined as taking on additional medical work for pay, should be restricted by resident programs.
To read the report brief, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Comments
0 comments on “Institute of Medicine suggests more non-working time for medical residents ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Searched
