AHRQ issues final rule for Patient Safety Organizations
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, November 26, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) issued its final rule for Patient Safety Organizations (PSO) last week. The final rule provides some finality to the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005, which provided for the creation of PSOs. The PSOs are supposed to encourage hospitals to voluntarily submit data and other information to a PSO so that the industry as a whole will benefit. Those facilities who participate in a PSO are afforded some legal protections.
The final rule did not change much from the proposed rule issued in February. However, some additions were made, including the need for a PSO to inform its providers if the PSO inappropriately releases confidential patient safety work product (PSWP), and increased flexibility in how a PSO differentiates itself from its parent organization. Some changes include additions to the list of which organizations cannot become a PSO, and more flexibility of how PSOs can store PSWP.
The final rule will become effective January 19, 2009. Until then, the Interim Guidance issued by the AHRQ will serve as the effective rule. To read more, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Comments
0 comments on “AHRQ issues final rule for Patient Safety Organizations ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Searched
