California passes legislation concerning prevention of staph infections in hospitals
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, October 1, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Almost four years after vetoing a similar bill, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed two bills on September 25 requiring California hospitals to strengthen their efforts in preventing outbreaks of Staphylococcus, reports The Los Angeles Times.
Hospitals will also be required to share their infection rates with the public. Hospitals have had most difficult combating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which is spread from patient to patient through unsterile clothing, ventilation systems, surgical equipment, or room furnishings. This strain can be fatal, and according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, an estimated 2 million patients nationwide contract an infection each year, and about 100,000 die.
The first bill requests that hospitals test high-risk patients for MRSA within 24 hours of admission while also reporting infection rates to the state. The second bill requires that doctors and medical professionals at hospitals be trained on how to prevent the spread of infections.
To read more, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Comments
0 comments on “California passes legislation concerning prevention of staph infections in hospitals ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Searched
