Study: Dirty patient toilets aid spread of CDAD
Patient Safety Monitor Alert, May 14, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
One third of patient toilets in a Canadian study of hospitals were found to be insufficiently cleaned. The study, published by BMC Infectious Diseases was done in an effort to see whether the toilets of patients with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) were being effectively cleaned, hence lowering the risk of spreading CDAD throughout the hospital. The study compared toilets of patients in isolation with CDAD with patients who were suffering from diarrhea unrelated to CDAD. This measurement was done by putting an ultraviolet visible marker, in the form of a substance called "Glitterbug" on the underside toilet seats of these patients. Glitterbug comes off easily with soap and water. Researchers measured to see how much of the substance was left 24 hours later.
The study found that toilets of those patients in isolation with CDAD were less clean, with a score of 1.23 (on a scale of 0-3, with 0 being no Glitterbug and 3 being a lot of Glitterbug). The other toilets had a score of 0.9. Researchers recommend this type of study be replicated in other hospitals to gauge the cleanliness of patient toilets.
To read more, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor Alert!
Comments
0 comments on “Study: Dirty patient toilets aid spread of CDAD ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Correctly bill ancillary bedside procedures in addition to the room rate
- Searched
