Proposed changes to Universal Protocol make goal more specific, add documentation requirements
Patient Safety Monitor, June 1, 2008
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor.
Editor’s note: This is the second in a series about The Joint Commission’s proposed 2009 National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG).
The Joint Commission’s proposed changes to the Universal Protocol would make the NPSG much more prescriptive than it has been and require significantly more documentation. Perhaps most important of the proposed changes is the requirement that a staff member directly involved with performing the procedure mark the site with his or her initials.
“Most controversial is the insistence on having the surgeon mark the site,” says John Clarke, MD, professor of surgery at Drexel University in Philadelphia, clinical director for patient safety and quality initiatives at the ECRI Institute in Plymouth Meeting, PA, and clinical director of the Pennsylvania Safety Authority.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Patient Safety Monitor.
Comments
0 comments on “Proposed changes to Universal Protocol make goal more specific, add documentation requirements ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Correctly bill ancillary bedside procedures in addition to the room rate
- Searched
