MASS-ive settlements for new/established patient coding errors
Physician Practice Insider, June 26, 2017
Two medical centers in Massachusetts will pay more than $700,000 to settle allegations that they upcoded claims when they failed to follow the rules for new and established patients.
The HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) accused UMass Memorial Medical Center and Boston Medical Center (BMC) of billing outpatient clinic visits for established patients with certain E/M codes for new patients (99203-99205). There's a significant difference in revenue for those codes and the corresponding established patient codes (99213-99125). In the Boston metropolitan area, Medicare pays an average of $47.90 more for new patient visits reported by a facility than the established codes.
It can be difficult for providers to keep track of who is new according to guidelines in the CPT manual. That task gets much harder when multiple locations share a tax ID number. However, the two settlements indicate that the OIG expects practices to follow the rules, and it will expect a check from practices that don't.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Joint Commission clarifies ligature risk requirements
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- What to include on the incident report
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- 3 ways CNOs can improve workplace culture
- Code diagnoses and outpatient treatment for PTSD
- Understanding nursing roles in quality improvement
- E-mailed
-
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Q: What are the requirements of an agency's professional advisory committee (PAC)?
- Q/A: Reporting L code and CPT code for splinting
- Q&A: Charging for drug administration during urgent care visit
- Prioritize sepsis assessments in your overcrowded emergency department
- Know guidelines and subtle differences in code descriptions for laceration repairs
- Joint Commission clarifies ligature risk requirements
- Food and drink in patient care areas
- Don't bill 59025, 76818 separately without separate physician orders
- Crossing state lines: What are the rules?
- Searched