AMIA seeks overhaul of electronic clinical quality reporting measures
Physician Practice Insider, February 9, 2016
CMS missed the mark in its recent request for feedback on certification frequency and reporting requirements for quality measures, according to the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA). While AMIA praised CMS for seeking information and opportunities for improvement to prepare for the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA), the Request for Information (RFI) failed to address the most significant problems affecting EHRs and meaningful use.
The questions CMS asked in this RFI primarily dealt with enhanced certification and positioned such measures as a solution to current deficiencies with quality measurement. The RFI did not address the current issues and complexity of generating and reporting electronic clinical quality measures (eCQM), AMIA said in its statement released February 1.
Providers generally lack faith in the accuracy and completeness of eCQMs, and heath IT developers sink significant resources into eCQMs at the cost of other customer priorities, AMIA said. The benefits of eCQMs are often canceled out by the burden of gathering and reporting them. This problem will only be exacerbated by the predicted increase in quality measurements as part of the Merit-based Incentive Program System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Models (APM) unless CMS overhauls its eCQM reporting guidelines.
Essential improvements should include pilot testing of measures and an evaluation of how practical new measures are in a real world environment, AMIA recommended. New measures should be certified based on how well they enhance patient experience, not simply whether CMS believes the measure is clinically appropriate. AMIA also urged CMS to rethink its definition of quality measurement and create a methodology that measures trajectories rather than thresholds and is more in line with care models described in MACRA.
In addition, AMIA recommended that CMS:
- Create measures based on existing EHRs and health IT rather than on ideal measures
- Estimate the cost of implementing and reporting new measures
- Test and certify the practical workflow of measures
- Make measures and reporting consistent across programs
- Allow practitioners who coordinate care on a patient to report CQM as a group
In direct response to the questions asked in the RFI, AMIA advised CMS to:
- Not change the frequency of recertification
- Work closely with ONC to develop new measures
- Create a consistent cycle of updates
CMS issued the RFI in December 2015 to explore options that might improve the certification and testing of health IT in general and EHRs specifically and reduce provider burden, according to CMS’ statement.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- CMS creates web portal for questions about 1135 waivers, PHE
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- E-mailed
-
- Coronavirus vaccination: 4 best practices for communicating with patients
- Q&A: Pressure ulcer POA code confusion resolved
- Neurological checks for head injuries
- Keyes Q&A: Generator lighting, fire dampers, eyewash stations, ISLM fire drills
- Including 46600 in E/M leveling systems
- How to get reimbursed for restorative nursing
- Fetal non-stress tests represent important part of maternal and fetal health
- Coding, billing, and documentation tips for teaching physicians, interns, residents, and students
- Coding tip: Know how to correctly code each procedure an otolaryngologist can perform on turbinates
- Coding Clinic reiterates guidelines for provider documentation
- Searched