Patient safety bill dies in Massachusetts Senate
Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education, August 11, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
A bill that would have established patient-to-nurse ratios in Massachusetts was left untouched, as the state legislative session ended on July 31. The bill, which was approved by a 133-20 majority in the house, was kept off the floor by Senate leadership, preventing a vote.
If the bill had been approved, it would have made Massachusetts only the second state (California was the first) to put a ratio into place.
There were two definitive sides to the issue. Some nurses opposed it because they felt autonomy would be taken away, and smaller hospitals were worried that being forced to hire more nurses to meet the need would hurt financially. On the other side, however, was the Massachusetts Nursing Association, which argued that the bill would help patient safety. A source with the association said the bill would be re-filed in January.
Sources: Massachusetts Nurses Association press release, Portsmouth Herald, Woburn Advocate
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Privacy, security concerns high in HIEs
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for dry skin due to cold weather
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Correctly bill ancillary bedside procedures in addition to the room rate
- Searched
