Mock trials show staff legal fallout from errors
Nurse Leader Weekly, July 1, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
The last thing you want is your staff member sitting in a courtroom defending medical errors using spotty documentation.
At Saint Francis Hospital in Charleston, WV, Director of Risk Management Patricia Skaff thought getting nurses and other medical staff into a courtroom might give them better perspective on the fallout from a medical error and the importance of thorough documentation, so she developed a mock trial to be held during a patient safety fair.
The hospital's patient safety team devised a fictional case in which a patient with multiple ailments was admitted to the hospital. The patient suffered a fall and became trapped in the bed equipment. The patient then developed a decubitis ulcer and died. Documentation of the case was intentionally kept vague and incomplete, says Skaff.
Staff were divided into jury members, witnesses, and an audience. The witnesses were given the record to review before they were questioned by the lawyers. The hospital's legal counsels played the part of both the defense attorney and prosecutor. The trial was staged four times during the day. Each time, the jury found in favor of the plaintiff, says Skaff.
"They could not justify anything but a plaintiff's verdict," she adds. "They were devastated but had no choice if they followed the law."
The plaintiff's attorney ruthlessly highlighted errors in the reporting and in the care of the fictional patient. The defense attorney was equally pointed in defending the hospital's actions. "The audience was kind of in shock when they saw how aggressive the attorneys could be with what they thought was an honest mistake in the documentation," says Skaff.
Staff now look at even minor problems in a new light, she said. A patient slipping on the floor can lead to serious consequences unless everyone follows the hospital's policies and procedures. The trial showed how small, seemingly isolated incidents can come together and lead to a terrible outcome for a patient and, ultimately, the hospital.
Source: Adapted from Briefings on Patient Safety (July 2005), published by HCPro, Inc.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- "Wall fountains" may be spreading Legionnaires to patients, visitors
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Searched
