New legislation requires NJ hospitals to post nurse staffing ratios daily
Nurse Leader Weekly, January 28, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
New legislation requires NJ hospitals to post nurse staffing ratios daily
In the fall of 2005, New Jersey will join Illinois as the only states to require hospitals to publicly disclose the number of nurses and other healthcare professionals providing direct care to patients, thanks to legislation signed by acting Gov. Richard J. Codey on January 24.
Illinois hospitals are only required to provide staffing level information upon request, while New Jersey's staff level disclosure law says hospitals must post this information daily in the facility where it can be viewed by patients and families. Under federal law, nursing homes already are required to disclose staffing levels.
According to the new law, facilities must organize staffing data by unit and shift and must include the number of registered nurses (RN) providing direct patient care and the ratio of patients to RNs. It also must include the same information for licensed practical nurses (LPN), certified nurse aides (CNA), plus other licensed or registered healthcare professionals meeting state staffing requirements. It also requires hospitals post the methods used for determining and adjusting direct patient care staffing levels.
This information must also be provided upon request to the public and reported monthly to the state department of health. The department will issue quarterly reports to the public, in which it intends to explain the data to consumers.
Facilities that fail to comply are subject to unspecified penalties that will be determined by the health commissioner.
To view the text of the bill, click here. http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2004/Bills/A2000/1727_S3.HTM
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- CMS issues IPPS proposed rule for FY 2013
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Reasons for inadequate fluid intake in the elderly
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Searched
