Nursing

ER roles harming nursing, public health

Nurse Leader Weekly, December 25, 2003

Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!

ER roles harming nursing, public health

Recently the Center for Nursing Advocacy in Baltimore, MD, launched a campaign to address the roles of nurses on the popular TV show, "ER." The two-year-old nonprofit group, whose advisory board includes several of nursing's most prominent leaders, has unleashed a protest e-mail and letter-writing campaign against NBC and the producers of the Thursday night show. The goal of the campaign is to help producers realize that the show is sending a destructive and inaccurate message to the public about nursing. Executive director Sandy Summers accused the show of perpetuating "long-standing misrepresentations that . . . are contributing to the nursing shortage."

The protest comes at a time of mounting concern among public health officials about the scarcity of nurses. Three weeks ago a panel from the Institute of Medicine warned that patients are being endangered by medical errors exacerbated by nurses' working conditions, especially the fatigue caused by working shifts of 12 hours or more.

Summers' group was particularly incensed after the show's major nurse character, Abby Lockhart, played by Maura Tierney, recently decided to chuck nursing to return to medical school. A few weeks earlier, an attending physician on the show summarily fired striking nurses, replacing them with inexperienced foreign-born practitioners willing to work for "minimum wage." In reality, hospitals are paying large bonuses to attract registered nurses. And ER doctors don't have the authority to fire nurses, as the show depicted. Nurses are supervised by nurse managers.

"People think what they see on 'ER' is real," Summers said. "Viewers, especially kids, see our profession as a horrible job. They see the show and think, 'Who would want to be a nurse?'"

Phil Gonzales, a spokesman for Warner Brothers Television, the show's production company, disagreed. "ER goes to great lengths to portray medical situations accurately," he said, adding that there are nurses on the set as advisers. "The series will continue to do its best to entertain television audiences while bringing to light the important work of doctors and nurses," he said.

A study last year by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that regular "ER" viewers learn about health-related subjects from the show, and some consult their doctors because of what they have seen. An earlier study found that children's strongest impressions of various medical professions were primarily derived from "ER" and other television dramas.

Diana J. Mason, editor-in-chief of the American Journal of Nursing and a member of the advocacy group's advisory board, said the organization has singled out the show because of its enormous popularity.

A study last year by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that regular "ER" viewers learn about health-related subjects from the show and some consult their doctors because of what they have seen. An earlier study found that children's strongest impressions of various medical professions were primarily derived from "ER" and other television dramas.

To Mason, who last year urged in an editorial in her journal that nurses boycott "ER" to protest its depiction of nurses, the show's fictional nature is no excuse for what she regards as demeaning inaccuracies.

To join the campaign visit, http://www.nursingadvocacy.org.
Adapted from http://www.post-gazette.com.



Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!

Most Popular

Related Articles