See how JCAHO surveyors checked out one hospital's compliance with its National Patient Safety Goal policies
Nurse Leader Weekly, June 28, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) 2003 National Patient Safety Goals were at the forefront of JCAHO surveyors' minds when they visited one California hospital in late January 2003.
Not only did they grill attendees at the patient safety/medication management interview on the 11 new recommendations, they also brought up the goals in the leadership and performance improvement interview, says Ann Kapernick, RN, BSN, CPHQ. She is the administrator of quality and risk management and co-leader of one of the three committees in charge of patient safety at Ridgecrest Regional Hospital in Ridgecrest, CA.
Surveyors wanted the anesthetist, an operating room nurse, a surgeon, and the patient to be involved in the conversation about the surgical site before the patient was anesthetized. They also wanted staff to document the time out. Here's what else surveyors focused on:
1. Medication management
"That was just huge," says Kapernick. She got the feeling that surveyors were testing out the "tracer methodology" on tap for next year, in which they will follow individual patients throughout their stay. At Ridgecrest, surveyors followed a patient or two, not only checking up on the medications they received along the way, but examining staffing competencies for the people who took care of that patient.
"They were really happy with our Medication Collaborative Safety Team," says Kapernick. Surveyors want to see a designated team for addressing medication safety problems-that's in addition to any general patient safety team you might have.
TIP: Establish a central committee, such as a quality council, and have your medication and other safety-related teams report to it.
2. Human resource (HR) staffing standards
Surveyors paid particular attention to these standards, which require hospitals to examine staffing levels coupled with clinical goals. "We were able to at least show that we had six months' documentation on two projects and we were able to show the data connected thus far," says Kapernick.
Summing up the experience, Kapernick says surveyors basically wanted to make sure that all the policies you've implemented are working. "That they're functioning, not just policy."
Adapted from: Briefings on Patient Safety, www.hcmarketplace.com/Prod.cfm?id=234&S=ENMW.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched
