SDW news brief: Study suggests link between night-shift work and diabetes
Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education, December 9, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
A study of night-shift nurses, conducted by Frank Hu, MD, of the Harvard School of Public Health, reveals an increased risk of type 2 diabetes among women who consistently logged overnight hours, reports CNN.com. When evaluating two decades' worth of data on 177,184 women between the ages of 42 and 67, Hu and his colleagues found that nurses were 20% more likely to develop type 2 diabetes if they worked three years of periodic night shifts, compared to those who exclusively worked days. The risk jumped to 60% for women who have worked the night shift for 20 years or more.
Several lifestyle issues could contribute to the increased risk of diabetes, including weight gain, sleep deprivation, and smoking. But the study also explored the possibility that disruptions to one's circadian rhythms, or body clock, could trigger insulin resistance and a rise in blood sugar levels, and could hinder the body's ability to metabolize foods depending on the time of day. Erratic sleep patterns caused by night-shift work contribute to this problem.
Though the authors of the study made every effort to control factors such as diet, sleep deprivation, smoking, and hereditary risk of diabetes, additional research is necessary to verify their conclusions. This study focused on a specific population of primarily white, female nurses; future studies require the inclusion of men and alternate ethnic groups.
The results of the study were published in the PLoS Medicine journal and reported by CNN.com.
Source: CNN.com
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched
