News spotlight: IOM issues 10 HIT recommendations for patient safety
Nurse Leader Weekly, November 14, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
Health information technology is said to be key to improving quality and safety. But even as providers rush to implement and master these expensive systems, there's an underappreciated chance that the use of computers might cause harm, according to a report from the Institute of Medicine.
"Examples of health IT-induced harm that can result in serious injury and death include dosing errors, failing to detect fatal illnesses, and delaying treatment due to poor human-computer interactions or loss of data," the 197-page report "Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care" explains.
Flaws in vendor products or common misuse of them, for example, wrong drug listings in a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system, may elude detection and sharing because of manufacturer confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements that vendors make purchasers sign, the report says.
"Thus, some vendors may impose or enforce such restrictions in ways that may conceal patient safety issues. As long as vendors may restrict the release of information about safety issues through confidentiality clauses, intellectual property protections, and hold harmless clauses, the healthcare community will be limited in its understanding of how health IT affects patient safety," the report says.
To read the rest of this free article, click here.
Source: HealthLeaders Media
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- CMS issues IPPS proposed rule for FY 2013
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Searched
