Website spotlight: Organization revamps wound care documentation policies and procedures
Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education, September 30, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
Chronic wounds not only affect millions of patients, but they also represent a significant burden to the healthcare professionals who are trying to manage and assess them.
There are many roads to wound care right now—physician offices, wound care facilities, hospitals, outpatient clinics, and home care—and all clinicians like to think that, whenever possible, they're delivering best practices to their patients and staff, but effective documentation as part of an already busy day may not yet be integrated into routine practice.
Plus, new legislation removing reimbursement for never events and the new mandatory reporting of adverse events means your facility might find itself shouldering hefty sums for hospital-acquired conditions, which is what wounds present on admission will be considered if they lack adequate documentation.
Such was the case for Prime Healthcare Management in Ontario, CA, before it standardized its wound care documentation. Prime is a 14-facility healthcare system consisting of more than 2,000 acute and psychiatric beds. After discovering its documentation was less than optimal, Suzanne Richards, RN, MBA, MPH, FACHE, chief clinical officer for Prime, took it upon herself to spearhead a revamping of the organization's wound care documentation policies and procedures.
To read the rest of this free article, click here.
Editor's note: To read the rest of this free article, visit the Reading Room, part of www.StrategiesForNurseManagers.com.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched
