Website spotlight: Recruiting nurses in the fight against CLABSI
Nurse Leader Weekly, September 19, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
Even with all the effort IPs put into data collection, surveillance, and education on a daily basis to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), sometimes all it takes is the dedication of a few nurses to get the desired results.
A study presented at APIC's 2011 annual conference, held June 27-29 in Baltimore, showed that by appointing IC nurses to specifically oversee central line insertion and maintenance procedures, a hospital could eliminate CLABSIs in a matter of months.
Researchers from the University of Maryland Medical Center (UMMC) showed that dedicated nurses on the facility's surgical ICU (SICU) sustained a rate of zero CLABSIs for a 25-week period, eliminating an estimated 14 infections and saving two to three lives. The reduction also saved the hospital more than $200,000 over the six-month period.
"This is truly an example of taking infection prevention directly to the patient's bedside," Russell N. Olmsted, MPH, CIC, APIC's 2011 president, said in a press release.
Although the infection prevention department helped educate nurses on evidence-based best practices and collected data on subsequent infections, the nursing department was the primary driver, says Michael Anne Preas, RN, BSN, CIC, an IP at UMMC and lead author of the study.
"The director of nursing for the med-surg division said, 'I don't care how you get this done. If you need to assign someone specifically to monitor these activities, then let's do that,' " Preas says. "So that was what they did, and they made reducing infections a big deal."
Editor's note: Click here to read the rest of this free article in the Reading Room at www.StrategiesForNurseManagers.com.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched
