Website spotlight: Medical interpreters key to patient communication, safety
Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education, August 5, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
According to Joint Commission standards and federal law, patients have the right to effective communication, including access to interpretation and translation services. It's easy to understand why. Effective communication with a patient is a critical component of patient safety, education, and informed consent.
"It makes people very nervous when someone comes in the room and starts speaking a different language that he or she doesn't understand," says Sherry Mazer, regulatory officer at Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia. "Imagine you're in the hospital, you're sick, you don't know what's wrong with you, and you can't understand what anyone is saying. How would you feel?"
Mazer, who oversees the Linguistic and Cultural Services Department at Temple, says there's a lot to consider with language interpretation. You have to take into account all of the patient's needs, including whether your language interpretation service is up to par.
Temple uses three kinds of interpretation services, all accepted by The Joint Commission: in-house staff Spanish interpreters, dual-role interpreters, and a vendor telephone service. The combination of services helps meet the specific needs of Temple's patient population, says Mazer. Spanish is the most widely spoken language in the service area other than English, so the in-house interpreters are most useful.
Editor's note: To read the rest of this free article, visit the Reading Room, part of www.StrategiesForNurseManagers.com.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched
