SDW news brief: While VA wrong surgery rates drop, close calls rise
Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education, July 29, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
The rate of serious adverse events involving wrong surgeries in the Veteran's Health Administration's medical centers has been dropping, but failure to standardize critical clinical processes is still the biggest reason for their occurrence and close calls are increasing.
That's the conclusion of an updated review, which tracked numbers, rates, specialties and causes of incorrect surgical procedures and near misses at VA hospitals between 2001 and 2009. It was published online in this week's Archives of Surgery.
Rates of incorrect surgeries per 10,000 procedures went from 1.74 and 2.29 in 2001 and 2002 to .53 and .51 in 2008 and 2009, and with the exception of 2006, when rates were 1.65, remained below 1.09 since 2003, they wrote.
Over a 66-month period between 2001 and mid-2006, there were 212 adverse events, or 3.21 per month but from mid 2006 to 2009, a 42-month period, there were 101, or 2.4 per month. Reported close calls increased from 130 or 1.97 per month to 136, or 3.24 per month.
The report identified wrong side and wrong patient surgeries as the most common type of adverse surgical event, followed by wrong site, wrong implant, and wrong procedure.
To read the rest of this free article, click here.
Source: HealthLeaders Media
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched
