Website spotlight: Acknowledging medical errors leads to more transparent, safer culture
Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education, November 12, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
Preventing medical errors and patient harm is a top priority for most hospitals. Physicians, nurses, and other clinicians do not enter their professions to produce poor outcomes.
However, medicine is an inherently risky business, and sometimes patients are harmed. Informing patients and their families of harm—which may or may not have resulted from an error—is always difficult. Providers find disclosing harm, and sometimes errors, is complicated not only emotionally, but also legally and financially. The majority of providers currently work in a legal culture in which they aren't allowed to speak of the event, counteracting the ideals of openness and transparency so often valued by patient safety and quality professionals.
In 2001, one hospital system began changing the way its physicians dealt with patient harm. The University of Michigan Health System (UMHS) began allowing physicians and other clinicians to disclose errors and offer compensation. The idea was to be open and honest, and if harm occurred because of an error that could have been avoided, to offer compensation up front along with an apology. The change, in many ways, created a more transparent, positive, efficient, and safe culture, according to chief risk officer Richard Boothman, JD.
Editor's note: To read the rest of this free article, visit the Reading Room, which is part of www.StrategiesForNurseManagers.com.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Searched
