From the desk of Adrianne Avillion, DEd, RN
Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education, October 29, 2010
Editor's note: This feature is written by nursing staff development expert Adrianne Avillion. Each week, Adrianne writes about an important issue in the area of staff development or answers reader questions. If you have a question for Adrianne, e-mail her at adrianne1@comcast.net.
Q: We expect our nurses to do literature reviews as part of their evidence-based practice and education council responsibilities. Some of them need help learning how to critique journal articles. What information can I give them?
A: Many nurses assume that if an article is published in a reputable professional journal then it must be good, but this is not always the case. Here are some questions nurses can use as a starting point for critiquing research articles:
- Who are the authors of the article and what are their credentials? Most journals provide authors' credentials, title, place of employment, etc. Do these indicate an expertise in the content area?
- What is the publication date of the article? When was the actual research conducted? It may take one or more years from the time a research project is completed to the time it is published. Based on the number of years, the research may be out of date. Check for timeliness of content.
- Is the research question clearly stated?
- Is the theoretical framework for the research described? Is the research based on valid and reliable frameworks? Are previous research projects cited? Is the research guided by the theoretical framework?
- Is the research method appropriate? Are valid and reliable research instrument(s) used to gather and analyze data?
- How large is the sample? How was the sample selected?
- What are the limitations of the study? Does the author address these limitations?
- What conclusions are made? Are they based on objective analysis of data? Are they analyzed within the conceptual framework? Are the conclusions supported by the data?
- Have the authors identified implications for further research?
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- CMS creates web portal for questions about 1135 waivers, PHE
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- E-mailed
-
- Coronavirus vaccination: 4 best practices for communicating with patients
- Q&A: Pressure ulcer POA code confusion resolved
- Neurological checks for head injuries
- Keyes Q&A: Generator lighting, fire dampers, eyewash stations, ISLM fire drills
- Including 46600 in E/M leveling systems
- How to get reimbursed for restorative nursing
- Fetal non-stress tests represent important part of maternal and fetal health
- Coding, billing, and documentation tips for teaching physicians, interns, residents, and students
- Coding tip: Know how to correctly code each procedure an otolaryngologist can perform on turbinates
- Coding Clinic reiterates guidelines for provider documentation
- Searched