Use the 'trigger tool' to accurately track medication errors
Nurse Manager Weekly, January 23, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Manager Weekly!
Adverse event data exists in patient records, but few organizations are eager to hire the full-time staff it would take to pore through all of the paperwork.
With this problem in mind, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's (IHI) Frances A. Griffin, RRT, MPA, and colleagues set out three years ago to develop a tool to quickly zero in on medical errors that cause harm.
Facilities who use this tool report success. About a year and a half ago, patients at Illinois-based OSF HealthCare experienced an average of 3.8 adverse drug events (ADEs) per 1,000 doses. Today, that number has shrunk to around 1.4 ADEs per 1,000 doses.
Tool development
Using various pieces of existing work, Griffin, the co-director of the Safety Domain for the IHI's IMPACT program, and the rest of the IHI's Idealized Design of the Medication System group, compiled a list of 24 medical-chart red flags into an ADE chart-review tool. They call it the "trigger tool," for short.
The triggers on this list often signify the occurrence of an ADE, and allow chart reviewers to skip over the bulk of a patient's charts.
Using the tool: the nitty-gritty
So how does the tool work? Start by having a multidisciplinary team do a monthly retrospective review of charts. Griffin recommends the team include at least a nurse, a pharmacist, and a physician-and that the members be kept consistent.
The team should review at least 20 charts per month. After a short while, "most people get to where they can do one in 15 minutes," said Griffin. Members should concentrate only on the part of the chart that will tell them about ADEs. "You don't want to read the whole chart. That could take hours," she noted.
If team members don't find any triggers in a chart, they should move on. However, the appearance of a trigger merits further investigation, because it may reveal that an ADE occurred. For instance, if Benadryl was prescribed, find out why. Was it an allergic reaction to a medication? Did staff know about the allergy ahead of time?
Decide whether harm resulted from the error, and then classify it according to the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention Index, www.nccmerp.org/.
Adapted from: Briefings on Patient Safety, www.hcmarketplace.com/Prod.cfm?id=234&ENMW.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Manager Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations, December 2009
- Hand hygiene rates improved through variety of reinforcement styles
- Press Ganey report: Patient satisfaction increasing across the country
- Residency Program Alert, December 2009
- Searched
