Inside the program: Use of percentiles as a goal
HCPro's Weekly Update on the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program®*, April 26, 2010
Many hospitals use percentiles provided by their satisfaction survey vendors as their patient satisfaction goal (e.g., to be in the 90th percentile). Percentiles are a way of measuring comparative performance, rather than absolute performance, as they are based on how the hospital ranks compared to the other hospitals in the vendor database. The percentiles are based on a comparison with the hospitals in the pool.
Therefore, the size of the comparison group, as well as the quality of the other hospitals in that group, will have a substantial effect on the hospital’s percentiles. For example, hospitals with the same HCAHPS results may be in a high percentile in one vendor’s database and in a much lower percentile in another vendor’s database. Before using vendor percentiles as a goal, consider whether the comparison group the vendor is using is large enough and whether it contains the types of hospitals you want to emulate.
You also may have the option of setting up a custom comparison group with your vendor so you can compare yourself to the performance of hospitals of similar size, type, region, and so forth. If you are interested in using historical national performance to set your percentile goals, the Commonwealth Foundation has created a Web site (www.whynotthebest.org) that enables hospitals to identify the national top 25%, 10%, and 1% for each of the 10 publicly reported Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) measures, as well as to see what their ranking is on each measure. The site is based on the data publicly reported on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Hospital Compare Web site; however, it is several months old. HCAHPS vendors may have percentiles based on more recent performance.
Source: HCAHPS Basics: A Resource Guide for Healthcare Managers
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Searched
