Inside the program: Following national guidelines for pain management
HCPro's Weekly Update on the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program®*, November 3, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HCPro's Weekly Update on the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program®*!
When determining how to use the recommendations for pain management in different populations and with different diseases, it is helpful to understand the strength of the different recommendations. Often the terms "standard," "consensus statement," or "guideline" are used interchangeably, but there are significant differences. When deciding on an intervention for pain management, use the one that has the highest level of support.
1. Guidelines: Systematically developed statements using an analysis of current research that can help practitioners make patient care decisions about appropriate healthcare for specific clinical circumstances. Recommendations for practice are made using an evidence rating scale from poor support to high level support for treatment options.
2. Standards: Criteria established by authority or general consent as a rule for the measure of quality, value, or extent. Standards can be used to provide accreditation and establish expectations for how pain should be managed in organizations.
3. Consensus statements or position papers: Expression of opinion or positions-usually prepared by societies, organizations, or academies-to reflect the findings of the society. The formulation of these documents includes expert opinion, available scientific evidence, and prevailing opinion.
Source: Adapted from Pain Management: Evidence-Based Tools and Techniques for Nursing Professionals
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HCPro's Weekly Update on the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program®*!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Hospice group to pay U.S. $1.83 million in False Claims Act suit
- Q/A: Billing for DME
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Providers report first RAC denials in Florida, South Carolina
- Searched
