Ask the expert: The importance of peer review process
Healthcare Training Weekly, October 23, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Healthcare Training Weekly!
This week, Laura Cook Harrington, RN, MHS, CPHQ, CHCQM, discusses the importance of a peer review and how it is important for the nurses and the patients.
Q: How can I reiterate how important the peer review process is to staff?
A: Peer review is about nurses taking responsibility for their practice and about nurses evaluating nurses. It is about raising the standards of practice for all, and ultimately about providing the best care we can for our patients.
If the profession of nursing does not focus on nurse performance— if nursing peer review programs are nonexistent or ineffective— then we run the risk of other entities taking control of the process for us. The best solution to this problem is to create or strengthen the nursing peer review.
The goals and benefits of peer review include:
- Improving the quality of care provided by individual nurses
- Monitoring the performance of nurses
- Identifying opportunities for performance improvement
- Identifying system wide issues
As the nursing profession embraces efforts to improve practice, it must also embrace the concept of evaluating individual standards and quality-of-care issues. Peer review allows such an evaluation in a safe, nonpunitive environment. It allows nurses to take control of their practice and to decide with their peers the standards to which they will hold themselves.
Have a question for our experts? E-mail your queries to Editorial Assistant Sarah Kearns at skearns@hcpro.com. See your name in print and find answers to your questions.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Healthcare Training Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations, December 2009
- Hand hygiene rates improved through variety of reinforcement styles
- Press Ganey report: Patient satisfaction increasing across the country
- Residency Program Alert, December 2009
- Searched
