Web site spotlight: Steam sterilization is on Joint Commission's radar
Nurse Leader Weekly, September 10, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
After working with multiple professional and trade organizations on the common and proper use of sterilization using steam, The Joint Commission has decided to refocus its survey efforts on all critical processes, including sterilization, according to a recent announcement by the agency. The accrediting body will consider sterilization an effective method if a complete process of sterilization is used.
The Joint Commission’s discussion focused on three main points:
- The terminology used to describe the sterilization process
- The indication-related issues that involve the selection of the sterilization cycle or method
- The process-related issues involving the way that a given sterilization method is executed
In addition, Joint Commission surveyors will focus on the critical steps of reprocessing. These steps include the cleaning and decontamination of all visible soil because steam cannot remove these compounds. Any sterilization must meet the parameters by the manufacturer of the sterilizer and the surgical instrument and the maker of any packaging. Also, each sterilized instrument must be carefully protected when being transported to a sterile field.
Editor’s note: This excerpt was adapted from the article, “Steam sterilization is on Joint Commission’s radar” featured in The Reading Room on HCPro’s online resource center, www.StrategiesforNurseManagers.com.
Do you need continuing education (CE) credits? Check out this month’s CE article to learn about flu pandemic preparation or visit our archives and view a compilation of CE articles (marked with an asterisk).
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Searched
