Web site spotlight: Proposed changes to National Patient Safety Goals
Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education, September 4, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
On May 12, The Joint Commission released proposed changes to the National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG), effective in 2010. The Joint Commission collected feedback on these proposed changes through June.
One of the most problematic and frequently cited NPSG elements of performance (EP) is NPSG.02.01.01, which addresses how organizations handle reporting of critical test results to physicians.
In 2006, based on The Joint Commission's annual report, only 61.4% of the organizations surveyed saw improvement in effectively communicating results deemed critical to patient care. Since its addition as an EP related to NPSG 2, effective communication, organizations have struggled to define "the list," establish reasonable reporting time frames, determine documentation strategies to facilitate data collection, and improve the reporting of this critical information to advance patient care.
Editor's note: To read the rest of this article, visit "Proposed changes to National Patient Safety Goals" found in the Reading Room at www.StrategiesForNurseManagers.com. Get a free trial membership that will give you 30 days to test drive all the exciting features on the Web site.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Searched
