Best practice: Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections
HCPro's Weekly Update on the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program®*, July 21, 2009
Organizations pursuing ANCC Magnet Recognition Program® designation or redesignation are expected to collect and benchmark two nursing-sensitive indicators, which the organization can choose, at the unit level. Urinary tract infections is a popular choice, especially since the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services made infections a nonpay condition.
Evidence-based strategies help organizations reduce catheter use and thereby prevent many catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). The first step for determining whether a patient requires placement or continuation of an indwelling urinary catheter is to establish whether the patient meets one or more of the following criteria:
- Bladder irrigation or medication instillation required
- Lower urinary tract obstruction not manageable by other means
- Neurogenic bladder conditions when intermittent catheterization is not possible
- Need for obtaining accurate intake and output in critically ill patients
- Massive hydration or diuresis
- Need to provide drainage in urologic surgery or surgery to contiguous structures
- Physician's order to place or maintain urinary catheter secondary to difficult insertion or other special procedures
- Managing incontinence in Stage III and IV pressure ulcers
- Promoting comfort in palliative care situations
Source: HCPro's Advisor to the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program®, July issue. Don't have a subscription? Take a look at the benefits of becoming a member of HCPro's Resource Center for the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program®.
Editor's note: Do you have a best practice you would like to share? E-mail them to senior managing editor Rebecca Hendren at rhendren@hcpro.com and see your name in print!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- CMS issues IPPS proposed rule for FY 2013
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Searched
