Inside the program: Don’t put non-quantifiable outcomes in your documentation
HCPro's Weekly Update on the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program®*, June 2, 2009
If there are no quantifiable outcomes related to particular evidence, do not include the evidence in your documentation. For example, you may have what you believe to be an innovative multifaceted program to prevent or reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). However, if you cannot provide evidence of sustained prevention and control of VAP, the example should not be included in the documentation. Most of the exemplars that your organization chooses to feature in the documentation should describe how your nursing organization was able to recognize problems, establish plans to address the problems, apply the plans, measure changes attributable to the plans, and revise those plans as necessary.
Source: Adapted from The Project Director's Toolkit: HCPro's Guide to Collecting Evidence and Writing Narratives for the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program®, Second Edition.
Related Products
-
HCPro's Guide to Assessing, Pursuing, and Achieving Excellence
Begin your journey to designation or redesignation with this fully updated book and CD-ROM. You'll gain an understanding of...
-
HCPro's E-Mail Tools for the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program®, 2nd Edition
This resource provides you with 52 customizable e-mails you can send to staff each week to communicate the history, value...
-
The Project Director's Toolkit, Second Edition
Full of helpful tools, The Project Director's Toolkit: HCPro's Guide to Collecting Evidence and Writing Narratives for the...
-
Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicators:
This 90-minute webcast discusses the nurse's role in quality improvement and offers practical tips to help you collect and...
-
Quality Improvement for Nurse Managers:
This book and CD-ROM clearly outline a nurse leader's role in quality improvement and offer simple instructions to improve...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- CMS issues IPPS proposed rule for FY 2013
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Searched