Blog spotlight: Main goals for instituting a shared decision-making model
Nurse Leader Weekly, February 23, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
This week, Barbara Hannon, RN, MSN, CPHQ, coordinator for the ANCC Magnet Recognition Program® at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (UIHC) in Iowa City, hones in on the aims of shared decision-making models in nursing:
The fundamental belief behind shared governance is that nurses at every level should govern their practice and be included in all decisions that affect their practice. This belief requires a redistribution of influence among managers and staff from one in which all decisions are made by administrators from the "top down" to one in which decisions are agreed upon collaboratively from the "bottom up."
A shared decision-making model's success is dependent on active involvement of nurses at all levels from the bedside to nursing leadership and must be supported at all levels.
The main goals for instituting a shared decision-making model are:
-
The creation of a method for effective shared decision-making. Shared governance allows for the inclusion of diverse perspectives from multiple viewpoints to solve issues and make decisions. This produces quality decision-making that is easier to implement. Staff nurse perspectives from the bedside can be included alongside perspectives from management, allowing for all sides of an issue to be explored in a common setting. In addition, staff nurse involvement in decision-making increases the likelihood of "buy in" at the unit/bedside level.
-
The creation of clearly defined lines of accountability for nursing roles. Shared governance allows for a flattening of the nursing hierarchy by creating clear lines of accountability for nursing roles. With a clearly defined model, all nurses have an avenue in which to take questions, problems, and issues. When shared governance is deployed at the point of service and decisions affecting bedside care are made at this level, all staff recognize who made the decision and the accountability for the decision.
Read the rest of this post and respond with questions or ideas. There's no need to log on. Just click the comments link and let your voice be heard.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched
