Web site spotlight: For this team, ’I’ was the answer
Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education, November 14, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
While examining its incident reports, Hartford (CT) Hospital noticed many accidents resulted from a lack of communication during patient handoffs. Adding an "I" was the answer to invoking some chatter.
SBAR (i.e., situation, background, assessment, recommendation) is a tool developed by Michael Leonard, MD, along with colleagues at Kaiser Permanente of Colorado, that is designed to streamline the way doctors and nurses communicate during telephone calls and patient handoffs.
Hartford added the "I" for introduction and required all licensed employees involved with direct patient care to follow the new communication protocol daily. To continually remind employees about ISBAR, the facility uses the following educational materials:
- Posters and flyers on every nursing unit stating what ISBAR is
- Laminated pocket cards detailing when and how to use ISBAR
- Pads of paper for staff members to organize their thoughts before making a patient report or phone call
- Pens that say ISBAR
Further, staff members are continually educated on ISBAR by:
- Rounding with nurses
- Presenting material during new graduate orientation
- Conducting patient handoff scenarios within small tutorials
- Writing articles for the hospital's newsletter
Editor's note: This excerpt was adapted from "ISBAR: Adding an extra step in handoff communication," found in the Reading Room at www.StrategiesForNurseManagers.com. Get a free trial membership that will give you 30 days to test drive all the exciting features on the Web site.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Staff Development Weekly: Insight on Evidence-Based Practice in Education!
Comments
0 comments on “Web site spotlight: For this team, ’I’ was the answer ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
