Web site spotlight: SBAR + I: Enhance handoff communication with an introduction
Nurse Leader Weekly, November 10, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
While examining its incident reports, Hartford (CT) Hospital noticed many accidents resulted from a lack of communication during patient handoffs. Adding an "I" for introduction was the answer to invoking some chatter.
"We decided to add 'I' [in front of SBAR] because we thought it was very important that the clinicians start off with an introduction if they didn't actively know the person they were speaking with [during a patient handoff or over the phone]," says Ruth Brunner Zafian, MSN, MA, APRN-BC, clinical nurse specialist in cardiovascular services at the hospital.
The thorough examination of incident reports prompted the housewide healthcare team, a multidisciplinary committee, to look at The Joint Commission's requirements for a standardized method of communication under National Patient Safety Goal #2E.
Zafian and nurse manager Lynn Ann Jansky, RN, MSN, launched an initiative to fix the communication breakdown during patient handoffs at Hartford.
The first step was to conduct literature searches on patient handoffs. During the literature search, "SBAR seemed to have the most press, it had a good safety record already, and it seemed to closely mimic what we felt most experienced healthcare providers were already doing [at the hospital]," Zafian says.
Editor's note: This excerpt was adapted from the article, "ISBAR: Adding an extra step in handoff communication" featured in The Reading Room on HCPro's online resource center, www.StrategiesforNurseManagers.com. Get a free trial membership that will give you 30 days to test drive all the exciting features on the Web site.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Nurse Leader Weekly!
Comments
0 comments on “Web site spotlight: SBAR + I: Enhance handoff communication with an introduction ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
