Tip of the week: Decision-making guidelines for physician leaders
Medical Staff Leader Connection, November 7, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Decision-making is the essence of an effective group. Meetings usually include action items that call for group decision-making. Some action items require creativity and brainstorming, while others require more forceful negotiation and trade-offs.
Effective group leaders must be clear about the type of decision needed for each action item. Following are three decision-making techniques groups may use:
Consensus: Consensus requires unanimous agreement, which is often difficult to attain. Groups and committees usually require consensus only when deciding straightforward, nonconfrontational issues. Reaching consensus often requires all participants to compromise.
Majority rule: Majority rule is best used when legitimate, informed differences of opinion exist, or when committees need to choose between two or more valid options. Close the issue after voting and don't allow it to be revisited simply because some participants are unhappy with the outcome.
Minority rule: With minority rule decisions, leaders are forced to assert their authority. This decision-making process should be sparingly, usually in crisis situations. When making minority-rule decisions, leaders should inform and request cooperation from all group members. Explain the thinking that led to an otherwise unpopular decision, and allow meeting participants to voice disapproval or provide input as long as it is constructive to do so.
The Medical Executive Committee Handbook, Third Edition, by Mary J. Hoppa, MD, provides up-to-date information and serves as a guide for MEC members looking to improve their relationship with the medical staff. For more information, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
