Ask the expert: How should an organization transmit proctoring results within the medical staff?
Medical Staff Leader Connection, November 1, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
You should treat proctoring results in the same manner as other peer review findings. You should add them to the physician's peer review file and communicate them to the committee that requested the proctoring.
In situations where an entity must use the results to make a recommendation to another medical staff committee or the governing board, you can make the proctor's findings available to that committee. In situations where your organization will use proctoring results to support collegial intervention to improve performance, an individual duly authorized by a peer review committee to undertake the intervention may review and use the results. This individual will typically be a medical staff officer, department chair, or the hospital's vice president of medical affairs.
For more tips, check out Proctoring and Focused Professional Practice Evaluation: Practical Approaches to Verifying Physician Competence, by Robert J. Marder, MD, Mark A. Smith, MD, MBA, FACS; and Todd Sagin, MD, JD, published by HCPro, Inc.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
