Ask the Expert: What does ’zero-tolerance’ policy mean?
Medical Staff Leader Connection, August 29, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Many medical staffs are adopting a zero-tolerance policy with regard to disruptive behavior, but some hospitals are confused about what exactly it entails. This confusion is because this phrase has been defined as strict and less strict.
- The strict definition implies that a single incident will lead to corrective actions and an automatic loss of membership and privileges.
- The less strict definition states that disruptive behavior is never justified. There is never adequate reason to excuse or explain disruptive behavior.
When used in the "less strict" definition zero-tolerance is part of the setting expectations layer of "The Power of the Pyramid," and if a physician violates the policy at this level, the organization's first step is to provide feedback to that physician and remind him or her of expectation set fourth in the behavior policy. Repeated episodes of disruptive behavior would require the organization to progress through the remaining layers of the pyramid.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Coding 'aspiration without pneumonia'
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
