The Joint Commission announces new National Patient Safety Goals
Hospitalist Leadership Connection, July 4, 2007
Healthcare organizations will face one new National Patient Safety Goal (NPSG) in 2008 that requires clinicians to respond rapidly to changes in a patient's condition and one new requirement on anticoagulant therapy, according to the July The Joint Commission Perspectives and a press release by the accreditor.
Unlike previous years, however, the requirements will be phased in throughout 2008, with full implementation required by January 2009.
The new goal and requirements are as follows, according the Perspectives article:
Requirement 3E: Reduce the risk of patient harm with anticoagulation therapy. This requirement applies to ambulatory care, critical access hospitals, acute care hospitals, long-term care and office-based surgery.
Goal 16 and Requirement 16A: Boost response time when a patient's condition is worsening. This goal requires hospitals to pick an effective method that allows healthcare workers to ask for assistance from specially trained clinicians when a patient's condition appears to be deteriorating. It applies to critical access hospitals and hospitals.
The timeline expectations for the new requirements are:
1. Healthcare organization leaders assign responsibility for development, testing and implementation by
2. A plan is developed by
3. Pilot testing begins in at least one clinical unit by
4. The process is fully implemented by
In addition to the new requirements, The Joint Commission retired requirement 3B, which addresses limiting and standardizing drug concentrations, for all programs.
The accrediting agency also modified guidelines on requirement 7A for all programs to allow the use of World Health Organization guidelines on hand hygiene as an alternative to ones advocated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
