Study shows success in treating impaired physicians
Medical Staff Leader Connection, February 14, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Physicians with mental and behavioral health problems have a successful rehabilitation rate similar to that found for substance abuse disorders, 74 to 75%, and physicians with these disorders can safely be monitored while continuing to practice medicine, according to a study by five members of the Physician Health Services Research Committee, a program of the Massachusetts Medical Society.
Researchers followed and examined data on physicians in
- regular psychotherapy
- attendance at support group meetings
- monthly meetings with a program associate director
- regular reports from professional colleagues
Physicians with substance abuse problems also had weekly random laboratory tests for alcohol and drugs.
"The most significant result of this research is that it demonstrates that we can achieve a high rate of success in maintaining physicians with mental and behavioral issues in the practice of medicine, or helping them return, with similar strategies that are well-proven for substance abuse problems," said lead author John R. Knight, M.D., chair of the Physician Health Services Research Committee, in a press release from the Massachusetts Medical Society.
Other key findings of the study include:
- Women in the study tended to relapse sooner than men
- Anesthesiologists and emergency medicine specialists were at greater risk of substance abuse disorders
- Psychiatrists were over-represented in the mental health and behavioral problems group
- Physicians who had involvement with the state licensing board appeared to have a higher success rate than those who did not
The study appears in the January 2007 edition of the Journal of Psychiatric Practice. (http://www.practicalpsychiatry.com.)
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
