CMS bonus for reporting quality data raises concern
Hospitalist Leadership Connection, January 10, 2007
Congress passed a measure on December 8, 2006 that gives a 1.5% pay increase to physicians who report quality measures to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). This move is receiving mixed reaction, according to a January 3 article in Healthcare IT News.
To receive the bonus, physicians must report how often they provide quality care using measures defined by the government (e.g., how often they prescribe a certain drug after to heart attack victims).
Chris Weiss, president and CEO of Hanover, NH-based Dynamic Clinical Systems (DCS), an online electronic medical record company, is quoted in the article as saying that no amount of money will entice physicians to submit their quality data to CMS if they are unsure about pay-for-performance (P4P).
"Doctors are afraid of private payers, and they want control over the care they give," Weiss is quoted as saying. He also asserts in the article that physicians would have more confidence in P4P systems if CMS would first reward them for setting up a quality data reporting system and then allow additional time to submit the data.
To access the full story, click here.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
