Proposed disruptive behavior standard up for field review
Medical Staff Leader Connection, December 27, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
The Joint Commission on Dec. 21 posted to its Web site a proposed standard for disruptive behavior. The Joint Commission seeks comments on the proposed standard, LD.3.15, which is open for field review until Jan. 24, 2007.
According to the rationale for the proposed standard, disruptive behavior can include verbal or non-verbal behavior that intimidate staff and threaten the culture of safety. Leaders must set expectations for behavior among those who work in the organization at all levels, including administration, management, volunteers, and practitioners.
Certain expectations respecting the management of disruptive behavior are covered in the proposed new culture of safety standard for the Leadership chapter that is already in process, according to the field review.
Proposed elements of performance include:
- Leaders develop a code of conduct that applies to everyone in the organization
- The code of conduct defines desirable and disruptive behavior
- All who work in the organization are educated about desirable and disruptive behaviors
- Leaders develop a process for managing disruptive behavior
- The organized medical staff manages disruptive behavior by physicians granted clinical privileges
- Leaders establish a fair hearing process for those who exhibit disruptive behavior
To access the field review, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
