Study: Younger and female physicians working less
Medical Staff Leader Connection, November 15, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
The workload of Canadian general and family practitioners (GP/FP) under age 55 has declined in the past decade while the workload of GP/FPs over age 55 has increased, relative to their same-age peers 10 years prior, according to a recent study. Changing demographics of Canadian GP/FPs, including younger and more female practitioners, could have broad implications for service volumes in the future.
GP/FPs under age 35 provided 18 percent fewer office assessments in 2001 compared to their same-age peers in 1992, GP/FPs ages 35-44 provided 23 percent fewer than their same-age peers ten years previously, and GP/FPs 45-54 provided 12 percent fewer office assessments. Meanwhile, GP/FPs ages 55-64 provided 11 percent more, and those age 65 and older provided 45 percent more, according to the study published in the November/December issue of Health Affairs.
Female GP/FPs, who represent a growing proportion of the workforce, have reduced their workloads more drastically over the past 10 years than their male peers. Between 1992 and 2001, female GP/FPsreduced their workloads by 6.1 percent, compared to a 0.1 percent decline for male GP/FPs. In 1992, female GP/FPs held workloads equivalent to 74 percent of male GP/FPs. In 2001, that percentage had declined to 68 percent.
"The fact that older GP/FPs carry ever-increasing workloads is cause for concern, as more physicians retire each year than was the case in earlier periods, and each retiree carries a workload volume that is larger than . that of each new physician," the study authors reported.
"Consequently, the coming wave of physician retirements could cause unprecedented annual rates of shrinkage in GP/FP service volumes."
Source: Health Affairs 25, no. 6 (2006): 1620-1628.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
