Stark law myths, part 2
Medical Staff Leader Connection, August 15, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
What is important to understand about Stark is that it does not eliminate opportunities for appropriate physician-hospital collaboration, it simply requires that such collaboration be accomplished through carefully structured and documented arrangements that are "arms length," transparent, and fair.
MYTH #6: Financial compensation for physician leaders is not permitted under Stark
To the contrary, financial compensation is entirely appropriate as a "fair market value" fee for documented services rendered by physician leaders on the hospital's behalf.
MYTH #7: Financial compensation for physician committee members is not permitted under Stark
Likewise, physician committee members may be compensated on an arms-length, fair-market value basis for time expended in legitimate hospital committee work.
MYTH #8: Financial support for physician educational programs is not permitted under Stark
Stark expressly permits hospitals to provide compliance training, and certainly does not preclude the hospital training its physicians in the medico-leadership functions they may be asked to provide on the hospital's behalf. Other forms of CME support may be provided under the "incidental benefits" and "de minimus" Stark exceptions.
MYTH #9: Incentives for physician productivity are not permitted under Stark
Properly structured productivity bonuses may be included in employment and independent contractor agreements.
MYTH #10: Incentives for physician performance is not permitted under Stark
Incentives for physician performance may be included in appropriately structured employment and independent contractor agreements, and may be structured into gainsharing arrangements as well.
The Department of Health and Human Services will continue to re-interpret Stark amendments in light of the critical need for physicians and their healthcare organizations to effectively collaborate in the coming era. Until then, physicians, senior managers, and board members should consult attorneys who are expert in Stark related issues so that they may take full advantage of legally permitted opportunities in this demanding and increasingly competitive and complex healthcare environment.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
