What to include in physician feedback reports
Medical Staff Leader Connection, June 21, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Since there is currently no standard performance feedback report from which to work, many healthcare organizations find themselves wondering exactly what types of information to include. Although each organization must decide for itself what physician data it will continually monitor, all reports should contain at least the following basic elements:
-
provider data
-
comparative data
-
explanation of the data
Within elements one and two above, organizations must make a distinction between two types of data-activity data and performance data. The two data types are often confused, which diminishes the usefulness of feedback reports.
Activity data refer to how much work (e.g., admissions, procedures, image interpretations) the physician completes within a given time period. Performance data indicate how well the physician does his or her work (e.g., clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction ratings).
Unfortunately, in an attempt to impress JCAHO surveyors with long, seemingly detailed physician reports, hospitals often lump activity data and performance data together, which makes it difficult to determine a physician's true performance. For example, activity data can show how many deliveries an obstetrician performed in a year. But what does that data really communicate? Activity data become performance data only when an organization approves and implements specific privileging criteria that state physicians must perform a minimum number of procedures within a certain time frame.
Consider, for example, coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs). If a hospital determines that a cardiovascular surgeon must perform 100 CABGs a year to maintain his or her privileges because that number of procedures is statistically linked to better outcomes, it should include that activity in the physician's performance report.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
