Deciding where to stand on ethics
Medical Staff Leader Connection, June 13, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
A person who believes it is important to consider the interests and concerns of other stakeholders in a situation is said to act ethically. A person who acts only in his or her own interest, even when others are harmed, is said to act unethically. In what they say and do, all leaders consciously or unconsciously reveal to colleagues and coworkers their stance on the importance of ethics.
Physicians are usually champions of the professional ethic, which says that each patient should get the best care available, regardless of the impact on others. One frustration of modern-day medical practice is that a pure professional ethic is no longer possible because serving only one patient, with no concern for utilization of resources, will eventually lead a failure to give any patient what they need. Therefore, the best hospital leaders, physician and non-physician alike, learn to balance this ethic with allocation compromises that are better than the only available alternative: the rationing of healthcare.
When choosing an ethical approach to guide one's personal behavior, however, the range of choices is somewhat different. As a medical staff leader, use the following guidelines to decide where you will stand:
-
The first choice is to "do what's right." Right in this sense means what is best for others -- altruism. A more feasible ethic is altruism tempered with reasonable self interest.
-
The second choice is a compliance-only attitude. This means being concerned only with what is legal. When a person chooses this stance, the main motivation is fear.
-
The third choice is to disregard both ethics and the law. A person who does so does not care about what is right or legal.
Most people act most of the time in ways that do not fit cleanly into these categories. Physicians must be allowed the opportunity to learn from their mistakes in the ethical tradition rather than being punished in the legal tradition. A non-punitive environment might encourage people to act ethically in a way that nothing else will.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
