British study: Privacy restrictions compromise medical advances
Executive Briefings Digest, February 28, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Executive Briefings Digest!
Bureaucratic and unnecessary privacy restrictions inhibit advances in medical research, according to a recently issued report from the United Kingdom-based Academy of Medical Sciences.
The report, Personal Data for Public Good: Using Health Information in Medical Research, is based on an October 2004-study that examined the use of patient data in medical research. Although the report focuses on medical advances in Great Britain-noting that the country is poised to make significant contributions to future medical innovations-the topic is familiar to American researchers who must comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, also known as HIPAA. The report states that complex legislation has led regulatory authorities to act conservatively in allowing researchers access to data.
Click here to read the full report.
Source: Medical Records Briefing
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Executive Briefings Digest!
Related Products
-
Medical Staff Briefing
This monthly resource acts as a support system by providing time-saving tools, expert advice, and analyses to help you...
-
Medical Staff Leader Connection
Subscribe to our weekly e-mail newsletter for medical staff leaders that provides them encouragement, tips, tools, and...
-
OPPE, FPPE, and Proctoring Solutions for Small and Critical Access Hospitals
This expert-developed, affordable program was created with your specific needs in mind. Our Greeley experts created tailored...
-
Advanced Practice Professional Solutions for Small and Critical Access Hospitals
This expert-developed, affordable program was created with your specific needs in mind. Our Greeley experts created tailored...
-
Low-Volume Providers Solutions for Small and Critical Access Hospitals
This expert-developed, affordable program was created with your specific needs in mind. Our Greeley experts created tailored...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched