Still time to comment on electronic claims attachments proposed rule
Executive Briefings Digest, January 10, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Executive Briefings Digest!
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has extended the public comment period for the proposed rule for electronic claims attachments, bowing to industry calls for more time to review the standards. HHS extended the end of the comment period to January 23, 2006.
HHS announced it extended the deadline because of the technical nature and length of the proposed rule and the importance of ensuring its accuracy and usefulness to the industry. The proposed rule would adopt
- two X12N transaction standards-one to request information and one to respond
- Health Level 7 standards for the communication of clinical information
- logical observation identifiers, names, and codes-also known as LOINC®-for use in information requests and answers
Click here for more information.
Source: Medical Records Briefing
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Executive Briefings Digest!
Related Products
-
Medical Staff Briefing
This monthly resource acts as a support system by providing time-saving tools, expert advice, and analyses to help you...
-
Medical Staff Leader Connection
Subscribe to our weekly e-mail newsletter for medical staff leaders that provides them encouragement, tips, tools, and...
-
OPPE, FPPE, and Proctoring Solutions for Small and Critical Access Hospitals
This expert-developed, affordable program was created with your specific needs in mind. Our Greeley experts created tailored...
-
Advanced Practice Professional Solutions for Small and Critical Access Hospitals
This expert-developed, affordable program was created with your specific needs in mind. Our Greeley experts created tailored...
-
Low-Volume Providers Solutions for Small and Critical Access Hospitals
This expert-developed, affordable program was created with your specific needs in mind. Our Greeley experts created tailored...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched