Undertaking a bylaws review
Medical Staff Leader Connection, December 21, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Dear Medical Staff Leader:
The importance of medical staff bylaws should compel every hospital and its medical staff leaders to ensure that they are adequate, accurate, and in compliance with applicable requirements. A thorough review of these documents should occur periodically to determine whether they do the following:
- Accurately reflect the structures and processes utilized by the medical staff
- Incorporate recognized best practices for medical staff functioning and structure
- Anticipate and adequately address conflicts that may lie in the future
- Comply with regulatory standards
Keep in mind that your organization should assess the bylaws on an annual basis and whenever a regulatory body introduces a new standard or makes changes to an existing standard. However, a thorough assessment of your bylaws can occur less frequently.
For example, some medical staffs conduct a comprehensive bylaws document review every three to five years. Others undertake this task only when they decide it necessary to take a rigorous look at the medical staff structure and processes to ensure it performs its work efficiently and effectively. Because the bylaws are a blueprint for medical staff functioning, this is an opportune time to review these documents.
Although your medical staff may decide to reevaluate the governing documents on a more regular basis, don't allow more than three to five years to pass between such assessments.
That's all for this week!
All the best,
Todd Sagin, MD, JD
National Medical Director
The Greeley Company
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Arkansas woman convicted for HIPAA violation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched
