JCAHO considers expansion of disaster privileging standard
Medical Staff Leader Connection, April 6, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
The JCAHO is considering expanding its standard that allows the granting of disaster privileges.
Currently, disaster privileges apply only to licensed independent practitioners (LIPs) working in hospitals. However, the JCAHO is considering extending them to cover non-LIPs, according to Robert A. Wise, MD, vice president of the JCAHO's division of standards and survey methods. Wise made the comments in a presentation at the National Credentialing Forum in February.
The JCAHO adopted a new disaster privileging standard in 2002 allowing physicians who are not members of the medical staff but who volunteer their services during an emergency to receive disaster privileges. The standard gives a hospital's chief executive officer or medical staff president (or their designees) the option to grant disaster privileges when the hospital's emergency management plan is activated and the facility cannot handle "immediate patient needs."
The JCAHO is also looking at expanding disaster privileges for both LIPs and non-LIPs to all programs, including ambulatory care, assisted living, critical access hospitals, laboratories, and long-term care facilities.
The proposed new requirements for disaster job responsibilities for non-LIP volunteers are now in committee review, according to the April issue of the JCAHO's Perspectives.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Searched
