When the MEC and credentials committee disagree
Medical Staff Leader Connection, February 23, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Dear Medical Staff Leader:
Is it appropriate for the medical executive committee (MEC) to reject a credentials committee recommendation and forward its own recommendation to the governing board? Absolutely.
However, the board should be informed that the MEC's position is substantially at odds with the credentials committee's recommendation. The board should then investigate the divergent recommendations made by these two important committees.
It is also important to recognize that if the credentials committee's recommendation is supportive of a practitioner but the MEC's recommendation is adverse, the practitioner must be offered a hearing prior to formal action by the board. If the credentials committee's recommendation is adverse to the applicant but the MEC's recommendation is supportive, a hearing is not necessary under most medical staff bylaws.
I do, however, recommend that the MEC and the credentials committee chair meet in a joint conference whenever an MEC recommendation is contrary to that of the credentials committee. A joint conference should solicit the specific position supportive of both recommendations and tallow a direct sharing of information concerning the applicant or reapplicant. (It is not sufficient to have the applicable department chair represent the credentials committee's position). The credentials committee chair should be invited to participate in final MEC deliberations.
That's it for today.
That's all for this week!
All the best,
Hugh Greeley
http://www.greeley.com/seminars/
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Answering service messages
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Are your workforce members texting PHI?
- Q&A: Coding for protein malnutrition
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Don't let these sentinel events trigger falsely
- Avoid the trap of probable diagnoses
- Searched
