CMS to issue clarification of its position on privileging
Medical Staff Leader Connection, September 15, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is currently drafting a letter to its state survey agencies that clarifies its position on privileging. The letter is expected to arrive as early as October, according to the CMS spokesperson.
The guidance follows on the heels of August discussions between CMS and JCAHO officials about what privileging systems hospitals must have in place to comply with the regulations in the hospital Conditions of Participation (COP) and the accreditor's standards.
Although CMS is reluctant to discuss the details of its forthcoming guidance, an agency spokesperson asserted that the JCAHO and CMS are "in substantive agreement" on the issue of core privileging. However, CMS will not specifically address "core" privileging in its letter, but rather explain what surveyors should expect in a privileging system.
For hospitals-some of which have received conflicting messages from surveyors-the guidance is welcome news as long as it puts all state surveyors enforcing CMS regulations on the same page.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
