Historical perspective: Patient safety
Medical Staff Leader Connection, August 12, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Dear Medical Staff Leader:
The healthcare industry's focus on patient safety certainly increased with the release of the Institute of Medicine's 1999 report that estimated nearly 98,000 hospitalized patients die each year as a result of medical errors. However, patient safety has long been a concern of innovative healthcare professionals such as Earnest A. Codman.
In 1916 Codman, a famous surgeon, was considered "eccentric" and temporarily ostracized from organized medicine for publicly stating that to improve care hospitals must
-find out what their results are
-analyze their results to find their strong and week points
-compare their results with those of other hospitals
-care for cases that they can care for well and avoid cases for which they are unqualified to care for well
-assign cases to members of the staff for treatment for better reasons than seniority, the calendar, or temporary convenience
-welcome publicity not only for their successes but for their errors so that the public can give them help when it is needed
-promote members of the staff on a basis that gives due consideration to what they can and do accomplish for their patients
Codman asserted that his opinions would not be considered "eccentric a few years hence." Unfortunately Codman's statements, which encourage physicians and hospitals to analyze patient outcomes and results, are still deemed eccentric by some hospitals 88 years later.
Take a good look at the bulleted items above and consider their applicability in light of current events and trends.
That's all for this week.
All the best,
Hugh Greeley
http://www.greeley.com/seminars'>http://www.greeley.com/seminars/">http://www.greeley.com/seminars
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
